Monday, September 27, 2010
Week 3 post
After reading the chapters in Book Club Plus! A Literacy Framework for the Primary Grades, and particularly focusing on the book club model, I noticed a great deal of similarities as well as differences within my classroom literacy instruction. I learned how important the appropriateness of text is in relationship to the quality of learning that will take place within each student. If each student does not have a variety of thought provoking, age-appropriate text to choose from, the classroom literacy instruction will be very limited for these particular students. As educators, we need to ensure that every child will have suitable materials that will enable them to gain the necessary literacy skills they need to have to be a successful student. While looking at the book club model, I noticed that there were several components that are very prevalent in my own classroom. We often utilized teacher read alouds, independent reading (in centers), shared reading (whole group), and writers workshop (both whole group and centers). These four core elements take up nearly half of our daily schedule for most of the week (thus far). As the year progresses, we will start up our guided reading groups which will be a major focus for most of the year. Some differences between the book club model and our classroom literacy instruction is the types of literacy centers that are available on a daily basis. We do not have centers on language arts, journaling, or unit work. Our centers tend to have very specific tasks for each center. Our five centers are guided reading (with a teacher), independent/buddy reading, handwriting/writing, retelling/listening, and word study. Within our centers, the children spend approximately fifteen minutes at each center to complete a specific task. These tasks vary daily as well as weekly and adjust to the needs of the students. These centers allow the students to practice reading in nearly every station, writing in two of the centers, listening/viewing in every center, and speaking in three of the stations. These five components are not only practiced throughout literacy centers but also in numerous and various approaches across curricula and throughout the school day. Our students are given a great deal of time in the day to practice their writing. We utilized the Lucy Caulkins writing program almost every day. We have been instructing the students to write about what they enjoy doing, what they had done in the past week or so, what they are planning on doing over the weekend, etc. At this time we are not allowing the students to create fictional stories. I look forwards to seeing what other literacy instruction is going to be utilized as the year progresses.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Kristen-
ReplyDeleteAfter having read your blog, I noticed that my kindergarten classroom is set up in the same way that your first grade classroom is set up, with the same programs used and the same format of the day. We have the same elements that relate to the Book Club Plus framework: read-alouds, independent reading (reader’s workshop for us), shared reading, writer’s workshop, and literacy centers. I found it interesting how you took the literacy centers to be completely different from what the Book Club Plus framework talked about, as I thought my literacy centers, or the concept of literacy centers, was, in general, like those that they described in the book. True the actual centers were a little different, but I took the idea of centers to be a time for learners to explore different literacy aspects independently. What I was wondering, was if your teacher ever taught around themes? Since we both have the same style and the same programs implemented in our classrooms, I was curious as to whether or not all of your different literacy aspects of your day are connected. I really liked how the Book Club Plus framework talks about bringing in a theme as a tying aspect to all of the various parts of the day; of having read-alouds and shared reading have a purpose, to explore big-idea questions. In my class at least, the only times that themes are drawn out, is if, during making meaning, or read-alouds, a specific theme is told in the story, and my teacher or I want to emphasize it to the learners. Never is the theme continuous, and never is the theme translated to the other literacy areas for the day. I was wondering if you think that the theme would be really beneficial, or if you think that your literacy areas are already beneficial. Furthermore, I was curious how your daily five is going with your learners. My learners have yet to start the daily five, and I was wondering how you are noticing the engagement your learners are having with the daily five. I noticed you mentioned that they have a designated time to be in each area. Do they get to choose the areas or are the predetermined by you and your teacher? I am just curious because my cooperating teacher and I are going to let the learners choose and I was wondering how it was set up in your room and the effectiveness you have seen with the way it is implemented. Furthermore, I am curious, in first grade, what is the main objective of shared reading. In the book it talks a lot about helping the learners to further gain concepts of reading by working in a small group. My shared readings are always done in whole groups with a big book, and the objective is always about teaching the learners concepts about print. I was wondering if the objective changes in first grade, and how you saw shared reading implemented in your classroom. Overall, I thought it was really interesting that we have the exact same style and programs used throughout our day, and I was just wondering your opinion on those various aspects. Personally, I think it would really be a great thing to integrate a theme into the various literacy portions of the day, and believe it would be a great way to bring all the aspects together. It would make each part of the day have a strong purpose.